Renata adler reports on two of the most talked about trials in recent legal history sharon vs time and westmoreland vs cbs and through a meticulously researched account of both libel suits paints an astonishing portrait of the vanity and folly of americas legal and journalistic establishments. The sharon jury stated that time acted negligently and carelessly but did not find evidence of actual malice westmoreland charged cbs with reckless misstatements of evidence and contended these distortions indicated malice reckless disregard westmoreland v cbs et al sharon v time ny knopf 1986. Get this from a library reckless disregard westmoreland v cbs et al sharon v time renata adler in the winter of 1984 an extraordinary series of events brought two remarkable libel suits to trial in neighboring courtrooms in manhattan and in doing so brought into almost astrological . Briefs transcript and opinion in the case of united states of america versus richard m nixon president of the united states et al respondents. November 6 1986 page 00025 the new york times archives reckless disregard westmoreland v cbs et al sharon v time by renata adler 243 pages alfred a knopf
How it works:
1. Register Trial Account.
2. Download The Books as you like ( Personal use )